Tutorial here : dianae.deviantart.com Hello people! This is the 1st part of the video screen capture I’ve done while painting “Hanagumori” : dianae.deviantart.com There are 8 parts total. Part 2 : fr.youtube.com Part 3 fr.youtube.com Part 4 fr.youtube.com Part 5 fr.youtube.com Part 6 fr.youtube.com Part 7 fr.youtube.com Part 8 fr.youtube.com This painting has been done in order to write a digital painting tutorial explaining the techniques I’m using to paint. This is just meant to be …
Title: Digital Painting Tutorial : Hanagumori – Part1
Rating: 
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ...Views: 55 views
Awesome, though the tutorial links are dead.
You should get a tablet. It will become your best friend when ur doing this sort of thing.
i didnt quite get that , i got a intuos4 aswell but i havnt tryd such :p could u tell in more detail plsssssssss ^^
*gaussian bluuuuuuuuuur*
It’s a type of brush setting, you need a tablet, then put it on size jitter at 0% and pen pressure and do the same thing with opacity jitter.
Just wondering, how do you blend your colours? Do you use the smudge tool, or something else?
a little of a dumb question since they put the info about that in the description but, it was a wacom intuos 3 A4 tablet. Good stuff, I’m gonna read that tutorial a hundred times! lol Thanks
Im sorry , this may sound stupid , but do you use your mouse or do you have a special pen for that ?
Thanks
….although in reality the digital work could look better at the end it won’t contain the same sentimental commitment by me (I believe).
Yes! What you say is exactly my point! I fully agree!
Let me summarize me: If I want to make a present to a dear friend I’ll use the most expensive stuff I can afford to make the work of art. Something the friend would hang on his wall that would be more than just a sheet of painted paper. And if it is for business and there are no other requirements: the cheapest possible means, which includes digital work that’s what I would use.
That may not always be a bad thing, though. It just depends on what the intent of the piece is. If it is meant to be a work of fine art, then it probably wouldn’t be desirable for everyone to have a copy. But if the piece were done to be distributed (i.e. an illustration in a magazine), then digital painting is the cheaper, and therefore, ideal medium to use. (I’ve done a lot of pieces for school where cost effectiveness was part of the grade.)
You are amazing.
I love your art.
Also, your english is very good.
If youtube hadn’t changed to french, I would’ve bever guessed. o3o
my goodness you do all this in 1 layer. damn you’re good
First of all, you’re adorable. I chuckled when you mentioned you didn’t put music because you wanted us to listen to our own favourite track. Second of all, I really admire that you do most or all of that on one layer, which I always find difficult to accomplish. I have a lack of confidence while painting digitally, so it’s really neat to watch your process.
i was wonerining what type of brush did u use n wat was the size of it. Also wat was the setting for that brush that u used first in the beginning of the video
When I say “unique” I mean this: an oil painting is just one and no other will ever be like it not even the best copy while at the same time something created digitally you could copy and print million times! (the material side of it not the spiritual one)
And everybody could have a copy of it cheaply.
I actually think that digital art can be just as unique as traditional art. You can also do much more with digital art. I think that, very soon, a digital painting period will start, much like the renaissance or baroque period. Anyway, I do agree with you where one does not replace the other.
And if you wish you could google the Internet for photorealistic oil paintings or drawings and you could find pictures that look more real than photographs, created with oils or just the simple medium of them all – the Pencil.
I wouldn’t say something is better than the rest. They are all great it just matters how you use them.
And if you want your paintings to last forever than you should use something like tempera or encaustics I believe. How about a 2000 years old roman tempera painting?
Technically you are correct. You can zoom in and add as much detail as you wish. BUT there is one big BUT – it is not the Medium that makes the Art it is the Artist. It all depends on the Artist’s skill, imagination, talent and mind. You probably know the fantasy oil paintings of Boris Vallejo. You also could check DRAGON STAR by TARGETE at DeviantArt. First time I saw it I thought it to be a digital painting created in Photoshop, well but it turned out to be an oil painting.
and with the diamnd example well i prefer the most valuable one which would probably be the 300 years one cause of its history but that doesnt mean the other diamond is not better or has a more beautiful shape or color, this is more like historical value what u r talking about, im talking about the quality of things
im just saying the final result might turn out better with digital painting, im not saying is superior than other art forms, each one is unique in their own way, but for example i think u cannot add as much detail to a tradiitional painting than u can to a digital painting cause u can zoom it to a point where naked eye cant if u do manual works and do stuff like that with digital painting
BTW I’m currently learning digital painting. It’s great but I don’t think it is substitute for real paints. It’s just another medium but not the ONLY medium.
You cannot hang on the wall a digital painting after all. Yes, you can print it but it will be just a poster and not a painting.
You might disagree now but I’m sure you’ll change you mind someday. And why I’m saying that? Because a few years ago I thought just like you but now I realize that there is nothing like the real thing.
You are right! If you talk about conceptual art, story boards, comics, book covers, album art etc. BUT here are a few stupid examples: What would you prefer: a real natural diamond that was discovered in Africa 300 hundred years ago that has a long history of adventures, intrigues, stories about greed and love or just another piece of synthetic diamond made in China or even just a piece of shiny glass?
well i think u can acquire better quality and more beauty in less amount of work, like painting a portrait that took you 3 years u can probably do it in less time with digital painting,and if u do it in the same amount of time u can acquire more quality ,realism,detail, thats what im talking about in digital painting,it might be easier therefore less valuable but the final result might be better
Actually better technology does not make you a better painter or better art. When you make a digital painting all you get is a bunch of electrons on you hard drive that can be copied indefinitely. While you can create exceptionally beautiful art with digital means they will never replace the true traditional art when the question is about uniqueness, true materialistic value, skill and knowledge. All sorts of painting have their place and purpose and one does not exclude the other.